24 days ago•

Interview transcript analyzer that surfaces themes and quotes

Views

976

Copies

156

Likes

195

Comments

Copy rate

16.0%

Prompt

You are a qualitative researcher with 15 years of experience conducting thematic analysis using Braun & Clarke's reflexive approach. I will paste the transcript of a semi-structured interview with a [participant_role] about their experience with [research_topic]. My research question is: "[research_question]".

Analyze the transcript and deliver:
1. Five to seven candidate themes with short conceptual definitions
2. For each theme, 2-3 verbatim illustrative quotes with line-range citations
3. Disconfirming or contradictory evidence within the transcript
4. Researcher reflexivity notes — where my framing may have leaked into the probes
5. Axial coding map showing relationships between themes
6. Gaps and follow-up probes for the next interview

Do not invent quotes. If a theme is weakly supported, say so explicitly.

Customise this prompt

Fill in 3 variables to personalise this prompt

Participant Role

Research Topic

Research Question

Preview

You are a qualitative researcher with 15 years of experience conducting thematic analysis using Braun & Clarke's reflexive approach. I will paste the transcript of a semi-structured interview with a [participant_role] about their experience with [research_topic]. My research question is: "[research_question]". Analyze the transcript and deliver: 1. Five to seven candidate themes with short conceptual definitions 2. For each theme, 2-3 verbatim illustrative quotes with line-range citations 3. Disconfirming or contradictory evidence within the transcript 4. Researcher reflexivity notes — where my framing may have leaked into the probes 5. Axial coding map showing relationships between themes 6. Gaps and follow-up probes for the next interview Do not invent quotes. If a theme is weakly supported, say so explicitly.

Example output

# Thematic Analysis — Interview P07 (Senior Nurse, Oncology Ward) ## Candidate Themes ### Theme 1: Moral residue from rationed time Participants frame the inability to provide adequate emotional support as a persistent, accumulating burden rather than a discrete event. The harm is not to a single patient but to the nurse's sense of professional identity. > "You leave the bay and you know Mrs K needed you to sit with her for ten more minutes, and you just... you don't have it. That follows you home." (lines 142-145) > "It's not burnout. Burnout sounds like a battery. This is more like corrosion." (lines 311-313) ### Theme 2: Silent triage of emotional labor Emotional care is rationed using informal heuristics that are never documented or discussed with management. Nurses described deciding whose distress "counts" based on prognosis, family presence, and perceived resilience. > "If they have family there, I move on. That's the calculation, even though I know family isn't the same." (lines 204-207) ### Theme 3: Protocolization as both shield and wound Documentation and clinical pathways protect nurses legally but strip out the relational work they entered the profession to do. Mixed affect throughout. > "The care plan has a box for 'psychosocial support provided — yes/no.' I tick yes. I don't know what yes means anymore." (lines 389-392) ### Theme 4: Generational divergence in coping Younger nurses (under 5 years experience) described active emotional compartmentalization; the participant (22 years experience) described this as "a skill I refuse to teach." ### Theme 5: Institutional silence as complicity Repeated references to the absence of debriefs, supervision, or formal acknowledgment of emotional load from leadership (lines 56, 178, 402, 467). ### Theme 6 (weakly supported): Gendered expectation of care One reference only (line 289) — insufficient for a standalone theme. Flag for probing in subsequent interviews. --- ## Disconfirming Evidence Lines 332-340 contain a positive account of a recent ward-level debrief that the participant described as "the first one that actually helped." This complicates Theme 5 and should be explored further — was this an exception or the start of a shift? --- ## Researcher Reflexivity - Probe at line 98 ("do you feel the system is failing you?") is a leading question and likely shaped subsequent framing. Avoid in future interviews. - My silences between lines 240-260 allowed a rich extended narrative. Replicate this pacing. - My own clinical background may be creating implicit agreement ("mm-hm" at lines 167, 223, 301) that forecloses alternative framings. Consider more neutral acknowledgments. --- ## Axial Coding Map Moral residue (T1) is produced by silent triage (T2), enabled by protocolization (T3), sustained by institutional silence (T5), and differentiated by career stage (T4). T1 is the core category; T2-T5 are conditions and consequences. --- ## Follow-up Probes 1. "Tell me about a debrief that actually helped" — probe the disconfirming case. 2. "How did you learn the triage?" — surface the tacit curriculum. 3. "What would 'yes' mean in the box?" — push on protocolization ambivalence. 4. Gender-specific probing with male nurse participants to test Theme 6.

Prompt

Customise this prompt

Example output

Related prompts